명상도서관

명상도서관

治療抵抗性慢性疼痛に対するマインドフルネス認知療法の試みA Pilot Study of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Refractory Chronic Pain 자세히보기
  • 자료유형학술지논문
  • 저자명林 紀行 (大阪大学大学院医学系研究科統合医療学寄附講座,大阪大学大学院医学系研究科精神医学教室,ほうせんか病院)家接 哲次 (名古屋経済大学大学院人間生活科学研究科・人間生活科学部,名古屋経済大学マインドフルネスセンター)阪上 未紀 (大阪大学大学院医学系研究科統合医療学寄附講座)坂本 淑子 (大阪大学大学院医学系研究科統合医療学寄附講座)岩田 昌美 (大阪大学大学院医学系研究科統合医療学寄附講座)大野 智 (大阪大学大学院医学系研究科統合医療学寄附講座)柴田 政彦 (大阪大学大学院医学系研究科疼痛医学
  • 학회/출판사/기관명日本マインドフルネス研究会
  • 출판년도2018
  • 언어일본어
  • 학술지명/학위논문주기第2 巻第2 号pp.91-108
  • 발행사항日本マインドフルネス研究会
  • ISBN/ISSN
  • 소개/요약This pilot study investigated quantitative and qualitative parameters to evaluate whether complementary alternative medicine, including the use of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is feasibly safe and effective for the management of refractory chronic pain. We studied 5 patients who received a course of 8 weekly sessions (2 hours per session) of a modified MBCT program for chronic pain management. No adverse events or dropouts (which serve as primary endpoints) were reported suggesting that MBCT was a safe therapeutic option. In terms of the secondary endpoint, a statistically significant improvement was observed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) showing pain intensity assessed in terms of an 11-step evaluation (scale ranging between 0 and 10), as well as the pain disability assessment scale (PDAS), which evaluates the correlation between pain and the activities of daily living. The 4 patients we studied (1 patient did not achieve secondary outcomes but only received MBCT until the end of the study) showed a significant improvement when assessed using the NRS compared with the 13 patients who did not receive MBCT. Notably, one patient described completing a significant volume of homework and exercises and consequently reported a remarkable improvement. The importance of breath awareness has been particularly and repeatedly described in this context.