명상도서관
Clearing the Muddled Path of Traditional and Contemporary Mindfulness: a Response to Monteiro, Musten, and Compson
자세히보기
- 자료유형학술지논문
- 저자명Purser, R. E.
- 학회/출판사/기관명Springer Science and Business Media
- 출판년도2015
- 언어영어
- 학술지명/학위논문주기Mindfulness
- 발행사항Vol.6No.1[2015]_x000D_
- ISBN/ISSN1868-8527
- 소개/요약In their article, Monteiro, Musten and Compson (2015) explored the criticisms regarding the proliferation of contemporary mindfulness programs by attempting to represent the positions and concerns of the traditional Buddhist community. They noted that traditional Buddhists have raised alarms over the proliferation of mindfulness programs primarily because such contemporary applications have significantly diverged from canonical definitions of mindfulness as derived from the vast corpus of traditional Buddhist texts and practices. In addition, they characterized such objections by traditional Buddhists as a groundswell of protest, particularly when concerns are raised over the absence of ethics, or sila, in clinical and nonclinical mindfulness programs. They also touch on issues pertaining to a clash of worldviews between religion and science, as well as the teaching of secular mindfulness programs in corporations and the military.
TOP
사전신청
오시는길
명상챗봇
